Watching Telly: Brian Conley’s Timeline

By | September 25, 2013

Thanks very much to Lewis Murphy of Fifty 50 Show for this, this recording was yesterday.

– For the lazy, here’s the short version: it’s round 2 of Accumulate.

– I had to go all the way to Sky Studios in Brentford for this. A long old trip across London to Osterley tube, then a 30 minute walk to the east, then getting completely lost trying to find the studio entrance with zero help or signage. Not a good start, Sky/Applause Store. Luckily I did find it. Obviously.

– So the set. Studio 5 for this, if anyone cares. Small studio compared to most I’ve been in so the set is obviously small as well, but for this show it works. There’s 3 podiums across the centre of the set for the teams, with Brian’s stand off to one side facing them (he will rarely use this). Behind the 3 teams is a screen mostly for the audience’s benefit, as the podiums have TOUCH SCREEN TECHNOLOGY in them for the gameplay. In front of that is some close-audience seating, then the stands. Here is the whole thing illustrated by a professional. The set is lit orange for most of the show, except for the final round, which I’ll get to when I get to it.

– Each team is a Pointless-style pair who know each other in some fashion. In this show we had a couple engaged to be married, a mother/daughter pair, and work colleagues who I swear I recognise from somewhere maybe they were on Pointless one time.

– We cleverly combine explaining the rules of the show with the order decision-making process: we see a “timeline” or a line with five years marked on it in chronological order. Then we see an event, for example Roger Moore’s birth. The audience is encouraged to give the year they believe it goes onto, then it’s shown if the answer’s correct with a DING! or incorrect with a BUZZ, along with green or red colour filter. If it was wrong, it’s moved to the correct place (I imagine, it was right in this case) and a second item comes up for another example go.

– After this, a third item to place comes up, and the teams must buzz to try to put it in correctly. Get it right, you’re going first, get it wrong, you’re going last. The fourth item comes up and the remaining two teams can buzz in to claim it. The fifth item is filled in, in a jokey manner.

– So on to round 1 proper. The first team is given 3 categories to choose from, then have to fill in an entire timeline themselves with 5 items given to them from the start (for example, one of the questions was to match fast food chains with the year they first opened in the UK, and the items KFC, Wimpy, Burger King, Subway and McDonalds were given). They do this by using TOUCH SCREEN TECHNOLOGY to move things around on their podiums, and the process is also shown on the screen behind them. They have 1 minute to put things in, and can rearrange as much as they like until they hit the button in the corner to stop the clock.

– Brian comes up to the pair to have a chat and then reveal whether each item was correctly placed, one by one. One point for each item they have in the correct place (unlike Accumulate, no increasing point values here). At the end, the correct timeline is shows, so we can see how well we did at home.

– As it goes along, obviously each team has fewer categories to choose from, so there is advantage to going first.

– Nobody is eliminated at the end of round 1, and scores are carried over into round 2. Round 2 plays exactly the same, with 2 differences: the time is reduced to 45 seconds for each team, and we’re no longer restricted to years things happened (for example, one of the questions was to place various UK tourist attractions alongside the number of people who visited in 2012). The lowest-scoring team after round 1 goes first in this round.

– After round 2, the lowest scoring team is eliminated. If there’s a tie for last, then the slowest team in round 2 goes out.

– It’s at this point where we had to re-shoot the intro to the show. Yes now, after a team has been eliminated, but they nonetheless had to act excited. This begins to show the competency level of the team here (admittedly on their second day of recording) that will continue on.

– Anyway, on to round 3. As a team has been eliminated a podium has to be removed and the remaining two re-centred. Since we had an overhead view of each team this means we also have to reposition the cameras to do so. Yes this takes forever.

– Scores are still carried over into round 3 (this will be important later) which is somewhat different. The lowest-scoring team still goes first, and chooses from 3 years rather than categories. They are then given six events, 3 of which did happen in that year and 3 didn’t. They obviously have to sort them out correctly, for each correct answer they get TWO points. Astute readers will notice they can only score 0, 4, 8, or 12 points in this round.

– The highest scoring team after all’s said and done goes through to the cash final (again, ties are sorted by time used in the previous round). Once again a podium is removed and the remaining podium is centred, thankfully the camera in the centre is stationary so there’s no need for any more jiggery there. Funnily enough the set is now lit green for the final, not threatening red as most sets do these days.

– The final timeline has six consecutive years marked on it, and the team are given five categories. For each category a video is played, and they have to put the video onto the timeline correctly. The video could be a music video, a movie clip, a news extract, etc. If they get it correct, they get £500, if not then it’s moved to the correct position.

– This is where the points accumulated in the game so far come into play. They start with 15 seconds, then are given 5 seconds for each time crys- I mean, point they have. This time does count down while the videos are playing, but after they place the video they hit the button to stop the timer and that’s when the reveal is given before the next category is picked.

– It’s an interesting concept. You can save the categories you know less about until later, when there are fewer years to choose from, but because there’s a red herring year there will always be a decision to make.

– After that they have some amount of money between 0 and £2500. They are then presented with one last round-1-style timeline with 5 years marked, and the question they will have to answer, but NOT the items they’ll have to place. They are asked whether they want to play this timeline on double-or-nothing stakes or walk away.

– If they play, they are given 45 seconds (I think) to complete the timeline. The pair I saw didn’t play, but it seems to have been implied that they can push the button Wipeout style to see how many are correct and then keep rearranging as necessary.

– This makes the maximum prize for an hour-long show £5000, which is touted over and over throughout the show, and the audience is expected to “ooh” appropriately every darn time. Compare this to Challenge’s revival of Blockbusters which offered prizes worth up to several hundred quid for a half hour show.

– This recording seemed to take FOREVER. Well ok not quite as long as the infamous Don’t Scare the Hare pilot, but still a pretty long time. Doors closed at 2:15 pm, we started not long after that, and didn’t get out until 6:45 or so. For one hour-long show (breaks are placed awkwardly mid-rounds by the way). Again, this was the team’s second day on the show, so who knows if they’ll improve, but it took longer than a Q&A show should. It was plagued with reshoots, pickups, and technical difficulties in the final round with the TOUCH SCREEN TECHNOLOGY.

Thanks Lewis. I think I’m slightly disappointed by this for two reasons: the description as sold suggested much more of a time is money aspect, or at least doing it quickly during the rounds would help you during the endgame which I thought sounded like quite an interesting short-term vs long-term mechanic but it turns out that’s just down to score (which is fairly interesting in the Every Second Counts stylee but not very interesting). Secondly I find the idea of this taking 4.5 hours to film absolutely baffling.  When I saw Amazing Greys the other day, that had a large set plus several challenge builds and was filmed as an hour long show but they were done in just over 2.5 hours. This is a small set with probably lots of fixed shots. What the hell are you up to?

I hope Brian Conley was entertaining at least.

Fun game

By | September 25, 2013

Ruler of our electrofuture Tom Scott has done it AGAIN! And by “it” I mean “made a game for UsvsTh3m“. Actually it was the brilliant Monkeon who did the previously mentioned at the bar Quizarray (sorry, chap!).

This one is fun and relevant, it’s “guess the foreign version of a show from a Youtube clip”, and you’ve got to get as many as you can in 30 seconds. Most of them are gameshows or recognisable light entertainment. I got 14 on my first go, see how you get on.

Happy birthday Fifty 50 Show!

By | September 24, 2013

The internet’s premier gameshow podcast is a year old today and what better way to celebrate than to listen to host Lewis Murphy act like some sort of savant in the unbroadcast(able) 21 Questions Wrong pilot.  That or the questions were too easy, something like that.

21QW will be BACK! when Dan gets his internet sorted. I might even up the prize budget.

Meanwhile if you can’t wait for that you can watch the original and best version in Italian every night or! why not listen to Ewan Spence’s Edinburgh Nights radio show and podcast where they play the eerily similar 20 Questions Wrong with minor celebrities like Junior Simpson. You can listen to it all here, and the 20QW segment is also podcasted separately (iTunes, RSS).

Only Connect’s on tonight

By | September 23, 2013

New series after University Challenge, 8:30 on BBC4. Enjoy it before it goes all mainstream.

I’m sure there was something else I was going to bring up but I’ve forgotten it.

Edit: Oh that was it, not gameshow but tangentally related as likely of interest – excellent and funny board game review site Shut Up and Sit Down are attempting some crowdfunding. If you like what they do it’s worth chucking them a few quid, and if you don’t know what they do you should rectify that, it has basically single-handedly rejuvinated my interest in the hobby.

Also friend of the bar, BBBOTS digiman and CELEBRITY The Line Up contestant Ian Symes is in a sitcom called A Brief History of Time Travel which is a thing that you can buy. Also Robert Llewellyn off of Scrapheap Challenge is in it.

Fifteen to One

By | September 20, 2013

15to1Friday 20th September, 8pm,
Channel 4

Well it’s finally here, Adam Hills hosts the return of the knockout quiz that puts fifteen contestants up against each other in a knockout quiz. In this one-off-with-a-view-to-a-series, those fifteen people are celebrities playing for charity, for Channel 4’s Eighties Weekend.

I expect the celebrity one to do OK this evening (it’s up against both Eastenders and Coronation Street so good scheduling there) and then when they decide to make it for the afternoons it’ll bomb.

That’s Yer (Pi)Lot: Amazing Greys

By | September 20, 2013

This is very exciting, it’s the first show I’ve been to see with smartphone in hand. This doesn’t really help with describing the show (except on Twitter on the way home) but it does allow me to make awesome jokes. Admittedly that gag would be funnier if I had learnt to zoom on the McDonald’s sign a bit better. I digress:

  • It was filmed at The Fountain Studios in Wembley, Andy Collins was warming up, Paddy McGuinness is your host. Peter Dickson is your voiceover.
  • The stage is large, it consists mainly of scaffolding, doors set into columns of varying classical styles, a large staircase back left which the contestants come down (also has a large screen at the top of the stair case, and a large screen at the back with a small set of stairs. The far left of the studio has some chairs and tables for the amazing greys to sit at, in a sort of geriatric Game For a Laugh style. The production team were very lax with people taking photos so I’m sure if you looked hard enough you’ll find a few online variously.
  • Young contenders (I think we’re talking under 30s here) attempt to take on old people (60+) in a series of contests based around the talents of those old people. If the contestant wins three out of five then they win £25,000, otherwise they go home with nothing. The show is set up so there will be six challenges an episode with contestants rolling over where necessary (in these instances which maths suggests will be often the seventh Grey is introduced to give an idea as what the first chasllenge is going to be about the next week).
  • Contestants come down a large staircase. After a chat Paddy introduces the Amazing Grey who comes out of a door with full stage smoke effect. Paddy will ask the contender what they reckon the old person’s special skill is, the contender will hilariously say something like “making tea”. They’ll play a film that’s been made, they’ll be a shock, then they’ll be a challenge.
  • In every event the challenger must beat the Amazing Grey, a tie is not good enough.
  • The challenges tonight were: a race to deadlift their own bodyweight 20 times against an 80+ year old champion weightlifter. I thought the challenger had a disadvantage here of being taller and therefore having more distance, but there we are.
  • A general knowledge quiz against quiz champion Brian Edwards whose name we vaguely recognised. This was best over 15 questions. The buzzers had a nice shade of red.
  • A rollerskating time trial over a short oval course against an 85+ year old rollerskating champion.
  • Target football against Sir Geoff Hurst MBE. Various targets were set around the goalmouth ranging from 5 points to off centre to 15 points for the corners. A big red cross target in the centre meant a five point penalty. Biggest total over five balls wins.
  • An anagram (“nanagram”) buzzer quiz against an old guy with an IQ of 157. Categories are given and they’ve been arranged thoughtfully so they aren’t too difficult. Best over 15.
  • Finally a tennis serving challenge against one-time World Number Two Christine Truman MBE. Simply you had to hit more balls through a target as possible in 30 seconds, but you could choose to stand from one of three different positions for a x1, x2 or x3 score multiplier, the furthest away being worth the most points.
  • It quickly becomes clear that even at these old ages they are no push overs, and they’re specialised talents are still likely to be better than someone who has had zero to little experience in something. Across the show it was 4-2 to the Greys, only just losing the roller skating and perhaps surprisingly, the nanagrams.
  • As such it’s quite difficult to know who you’re meant to get behind – the youngster playing for a large amount of cash or the Grey showing off that they can still show the young ‘uns a thing or two even in their advanced years. The audience seemed to be backing the Greys.
  • Paddy McGuinness is basically as matey and unthreatening as he is on Take Me Out. They haven’t seemed to have got much in the way of “no likey, no lighty” crap catchphrases down, although there were several plays on OAPs (although the only one I could remember was referring to them as OMG OAPs).
  • Font fans will be “pleased” to note that Impact is the font of choice.
  • It’s made to the current level of ITV slickness and standards (think Catchphrase – basically decent albeit with light broad strokes rather than precision) and was actually a fast recording for all the setting up they had to do – started at seven, done by about half nine, so that’s good.
  • I gather it’s been piloted around the world to little success. I can see this fitting on the schedule on Sunday nights although I think it’s the sort of thing that’ll be tolerated rather than loved, and if it wasn’t for the success of Off Their Rockers probably wouldn’t have bothered at all. It was a pleasant enough experience but not really a must watch. Not quite as good as Just 1 Thing for me, and that wasn’t perfect by any means but did feel like it had a bit more weight.
  • As with all recording reports it comes with the caveat that we don’t know how it will edit and ultimately that’s what it’s going to be sold on. We’ve come to trust gut feeling and it didn’t really feel much either way coming out of the recording.